Skip to main content

Table 15 Logit regression of RPE usage in executive compensation contracts

From: Preaching water but drinking wine? Relative performance evaluation in international banking

 

Unscaled

Scaled

Independent variables

Knor

Kcos

Kuni

Knor

Kcos

Kuni

Intercept

15.31

14.93

15.47

14.93

14.72

15.12

 

(0.25)

(0.26)

(0.24)

(0.26)

(0.27)

(0.25)

Compensation

0.47

0.47

0.47

0.47

0.47

0.48

 

(0.38)

(0.38)

(0.38)

(0.38)

(0.37)

(0.37)

Firm perf

− 0.28

− 0.29

− 0.21

− 0.24

− 0.25

− 0.22

 

(0.74)

(0.73)

(0.80)

(0.78)

(0.76)

(0.79)

Peer return (Kernel)

1.16

0.95

0.91

0.82

0.77

0.72

 

(0.46)

(0.45)

(0.55)

(0.51)

(0.50)

(0.53)

Firm size (sales)

2.69***

2.71***

2.69***

2.70***

2.71***

2.71***

 

(0.00)

(0.00)

(0.00)

(0.00)

(0.00)

(0.00)

Growth options

− 19.90*

− 19.52

− 19.99*

− 19.50

− 19.31

− 19.65*

 

(0.10)

(0.10)

(0.09)

(0.10)

(0.11)

(0.10)

Year dummies

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

 

Industry dummies

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Country dummies

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

R 2

52.64%

52.64%

52.62%

52.64%

52.64%

52.63%

Number of observation

335

335

335

335

335

335

  1. Note: The table documents logit regression results for the equation yit=γ0+γ1·Compit+γ2·FirmPerfit+γ3·PeerPerfit+γ4·Cit+uit. The dependent variable is RPE, an indicator variable which is equal to 1 if the firm discloses peer group use in the compensation contracts. We regress RPE on firm performance, peer returns, firm size, and growth options for 318 firm-year observations over the time span 2004–2013. We include year, country, and industry dummies. We report three versions of the Kernel-based approached: (1) based on the pdf of the standard normal distribution (Knor), 2) based the pdf of the uniform distribution (Kuni), and (3) based the pdf of the “cosine distribution” (Kcos). The panel “scaled” refers to the variants where we multiply the standardized differences with a scaling factor, as described in the “Kernel-based peer group construction” section. We report Cox and Snell’s R2. Significance levels are two-sided and are denoted as follows: 1% (), 5% (), and 10% (). The corresponding p values are reported in parentheses below each coefficient estimate