From: What Goliaths and Davids among Swiss firms tell us about expected returns on Swiss asset markets
Panel A: Predictive power of US predictors | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
h=1 | h=3 | h=6 | h=12 | |||||
Predictor | \(\hat {\beta }\) | R2(%) | \(\hat {\beta }\) | R2(%) | \(\hat {\beta }\) | R2(%) | \(\hat {\beta }\) | R2(%) |
dp | 0.27 | 0.48 | 0.36 | 1.88 | 0.46 | 5.36 | 0.52* | 11.52 |
(p value) | (0.23) | (0.19) | (0.11) | (0.06) | ||||
dy | 0.40 | 1.03 | 0.44 | 2.76 | 0.53* | 6.92 | 0.55** | 13.03 |
(p value) | (0.12) | (0.12) | (0.06) | (0.05) | ||||
ep | 0.23 | 0.34 | 0.13 | 0.26 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 1.07 |
(p value) | (0.32) | (0.42) | (0.45) | (0.38) | ||||
de | – 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.52 | 0.10 | 0.45 |
(p value) | (0.52) | (0.43) | (0.35) | (0.36) | ||||
svar | – 0.67*** | 2.83 | – 0.66*** | 6.47 | – 0.31 | 2.38 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
(p value) | (0.00) | (0.00) | (0.25) | (0.45) | ||||
ntis | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.91 | 0.24 | 1.38 | 0.21 | 1.88 |
(p value) | (0.35) | (0.32) | (0.36) | (0.37) | ||||
ts | – 0.27 | 0.48 | – 0.18 | 0.47 | – 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.22 | 2.05 |
(p value) | (0.83) | (0.70) | (0.55) | (0.25) | ||||
ds | – 0.41 | 1.06 | – 0.23 | 0.80 | – 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.96 |
(p value) | (0.78) | (0.60) | (0.48) | (0.32) | ||||
Panel B: marginal contribution of GVDnew in the presence of best US predictor at each forecast horizon | ||||||||
\(\hat {\beta }\) | Partial R2(%) | \(\hat {\beta }\) | Partial R2(%) | \(\hat {\beta }\) | Partial R2(%) | \(\hat {\beta }\) | Partial R2(%) | |
GVDnew | 0.54* | 1.78 | 0.55** | 4.58 | 0.51** | 3.80 | 0.39* | 4.31 |
(p value) | (0.07) | (0.04) | (0.04) | (0.10) |