Table 10 Association between implicit emission tax and employment: alternative binary cases
| Â | Dependent variable | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Â | log(\({\text {employment}}_{i,j,t}\)) | ||
| Â | (1) | (2) | (3) |
| Â | \(x=0.5\) | \(x=0.45\) | \(x=0.55\) |
Implicit emission \({\text {tax}}_{j,t}\) \(\times \) \({\mathbb {1}}_{\eta \ge x}\) | 0.0381\(^{***}\) | 0.0343\(^{***}\) | 0.0419\(^{***}\) |
(0.0147) | (0.0140) | (0.0105) | |
Implicit emission \({\text {tax}}_{j,t}\) \(\times \) \({\mathbb {1}}_{\eta < x}\) | 0.0071 | 0.0050 | 0.0080 |
(0.0106) | (0.0105) | (0.0154) | |
Occupation fixed effects | \(\checkmark \) | \(\checkmark \) | \(\checkmark \) |
Industry fixed effects | \(\checkmark \) | \(\checkmark \) | \(\checkmark \) |
Year dummies | \(\checkmark \) | \(\checkmark \) | \(\checkmark \) |
Observations | 22,642 | 22,642 | 22,642 |
Pseudo-\({\text {R}}^{2}\) | 0.0693 | 0.0694 | 0.0692 |