- Open Access
Should Marginal Cost of Public Funds Include the Revenue Effect?
Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics volume 147, pages 1–16 (2011)
It is an important difference in different measures of the marginal cost of public funds whether to take into account the “revenue effect” emphasized by Atkinson and Stern (1974). This paper tries to reconcile two competing measures from a general viewpoint. We demonstrate that the revenue effect represents a distortionary effect associated with commodity taxation as opposed to a “windfall.” We thus derive a new measure which captures the distortionary effect associated with commodity as opposed to lump-sum taxation. This new measure is guaranteed to be higher than unity. Moreover, this new measure lies between the two measures.
Aronsson, Thomas (2008), “Social Accounting and the Public Sector”, International Economic Review, 49 (1), pp. 349–375.
Atkinson, Anthony B., and Nicholas H. Stern (1974), “Pigou, Taxation and Public Goods”, Review of Economic Studies, 41, pp. 119–128.
Atkinson, Anthony B., and Joseph E. Stiglitz (1980), Lectures on Public Economics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Ballard, Charles L. (1990), “Marginal Welfare Cost Calculations: Differential Analysis vs. Balanced-Budget Analysis”, Journal of Public Economics, 41 (2), pp. 263–276.
Ballard, Charles L., and Don Fullerton (1992), “Distortionary Taxes and the Provision of Public Goods”, Journal of Economic Perspective, 6 (3) pp. 117–131.
Ballard, Charles L., John B. Shoven and John Whalley (1985), “General Equilibrium Computations of the Marginal Welfare Costs of Taxes in the United States”, American Economic Review, 75, pp. 128–138.
Batina, Raymond G., and Toshihiro Ihori (2005), Public Goods: Theories and Evidence, Springer, New York.
Besley, Timothy, and Ian Jewitt (1991), “Decentralizing Public Good Supply”, Econometrica, 59 (6), pp. 1769–1778.
Bös, Dieter (1989), Public Enterprise, Economics Theory and Application, 2nd ed., North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Browning, Edgar K. (1976), “The Marginal Cost of Public Funds”, Journal of Political Economy, 84, pp. 283–298.
Browning, Edgar K. (1987), “On the Marginal Welfare Cost of Taxation”, American Economic Review, 77, pp. 11–23.
Chang, C., and Hsiao-Ping Peng (2009), “Structure Regulation, Price Structure, Cross Subsidization and Marginal Cost of Public Funds”, The Manchester School, 77 (5), pp. 618–641.
Christiansen, Vidar (2007), “Two Approaches to Determine Public Good Provision under Distortionary Taxation”, National Tax Journal, 60 (1), pp. 25–43.
Dahlby, Bev (2008), The Marginal Cost of Public Funds: Theory and Applications, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. and London.
Diamond, Peter A. (1975), “A Many-Person Ramsey Rule”, Journal of Public Economics, 4, pp. 335–342.
Feldstein, Martin (1997), “How Big Should Government Be?”, National Tax Journal, 50 (2), pp. 197–213.
Fullerton, Don (1991), “Reconciling Recent Estimates of the Marginal Welfare Cost of Taxation”, American Economic Review, 81 (1), pp. 302–308.
Karras, Georgios (1996), “The Optimal Government Size: Further International Evidence on the Productivity of Government Services”, Economic Inquiry, 34 (2), pp. 193–203.
King, Mervyn A. (1986), “A Pigovian Rule for the Optimum Provision of Public Goods”, Journal of Public Economics, 30, pp. 273–291.
Liu, Liqun (2003), “A Marginal Cost of Funds Approach to Multi-Period Public Project Evaluation: Implications for the Social Discount Rate”, Journal of Public Economics, 87, pp. 1707–1718.
Mayshar, Joram (1990), “On Measures of Excess Burden and their Application”, Journal of Public Economics, 41, pp. 263–289.
Mayshar, Joram (1991), “On Measuring the Marginal Cost of Funds Analytically”, American Economic Review, 81, pp. 1329–1335.
Ng, Yew-Kwang (2000), “The Optimal Size of Public Spending and the Distortionary Cost of Taxation”, National Tax Journal, 53 (2), pp. 253–272.
Pigou, Arthur C. (1947), Public Finance, Macmillan, London.
Slemrod, Joel, and Shlomo Yitzhaki (2001), “Integrating Expenditure and Tax Decisions: The Marginal Cost of Funds and the Marginal Benefit of Projects”, National Tax Journal, 54 (2), pp. 189–201.
Snow, Arthur, and Ronald S. Warren, Jr. (1996), “The Marginal Welfare Cost of Public Funds: Theory and Estimates”, Journal of Public Economics, 61, pp. 289–305.
Stern, Nicholas (1986), “A Note on Commodity Taxation: The Choice Of Variable and the Slutsky, Hessian and Antonelli Matrices (SHAM)”, Review of Economic Studies, 53, pp. 293–299.
Stiglitz, Joseph E., and Partha Dasgupta (1971), “Differential Taxation, Public Goods and Economic Efficiency”, Review of Economic Studies, 38 (114), pp. 151–174.
Stuart, Charles E. (1984), “Welfare Costs per Dollar of Additional Tax Revenue in the United States”, American Economic Review, 74, pp. 352–362.
Tirole, Jean (1988), The Theory of Industrial Organization, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. and London.
Wildasin, David E. (1984), “On Public Good Provision with Distortionary Taxation”, Economic Inquiry, 22, pp. 227–243.
The authors are grateful for helpful comments by one anonymous referee and the editor of this journal, Professor Klaus Neusser. The authors also would like to thank the participants of a seminar in the Graduate Institute of Industrial Economics, National Central University, Taiwan, in 2006, for their valuable comments.
About this article
Cite this article
Chang, M.C., Wu, S. Should Marginal Cost of Public Funds Include the Revenue Effect?. Swiss J Economics Statistics 147, 1–16 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03399339
- marginal cost of public funds
- Pigou effect
- revenue effect
- Ramsey taxation
- public good