Skip to main content

The Swiss debt brake — has it been a success?

Summary

This paper describes how the Swiss fiscal rule at federal level has fared since it was introduced in 2003. Generally speaking, the rule has modified the budget process and led to a better implementation of fiscal policy objectives. It is argued that the most important factor is the existence of a binding ceiling for expenditure. The design of the mechanism is important in setting the right incentives. A basic feature of the rule is its simplicity and transparency. It is argued that an increase in sophistication would eliminate this advantage without guaranteeing preferable outcomes. It appears that the rule has contributed to a substantial reduction in nominal debt. This outcome has occurred against the backdrop of a favourable economic situation (which was not anticipated) and is primarily attributable to an underestimation of both revenues and economic growth. Nominal debt reduction may not materialise to the same extent under different circumstances. It appears that systematic underspending with respect to the budget leads to a bias towards budget surpluses. In addition, there has been no visible reduction in the quality of budget composition, and the fiscal policy stance as measured by the change in the cyclically adjusted budget balance has been appropriate given the prevailing economic conditions. While some design features may be debatable, the overall rules-based approach to fiscal policy has been successful.

References

  • Alesina, Alberto, and Roberto Perotti (1995), “The Political Economy of Budget Deficits”, IMF Staff Papers, 42, pp. 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BAK Basel (2011), Erreichbarkeit als Standortfaktor: Globale und Kontinentale Erreichbarkeit im Jahr 2010, Öffentlicher Bericht zur Projektphase 2011.

  • Bodmer, Frank (2006), “The Swiss Debt Brake: How it Works and What Can Go Wrong”, Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 142(3), pp. 307–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Geoffrey, and James M. Buchanan (1985), The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruchez, Pierre-Alain (2003), «Réexamen du calcul du coefficient k», Swiss Federal Finance Administration, Working Paper 2.

  • Bruchez, Pierre-Alain, and Eva Matter Schaffner (2011), «Des règles budgétaires pour les assurances sociales», La Vie économique 1/2–2011.

  • Colombier, Carsten (2003), „Der Zusammenhang zwischen dem Bruttoinlandsprodukt und den Schweizer Bundeseinnahmen“, Swiss Federal Finance Administration, Working Paper 5.

  • Dabàn, Teresa, Enrica Detragiache, Gabriel di Bella, Gian Maria Milesi-Ferretti, and Steven Symansky (2003), “Rules-Based Fiscal Policy in France, Germany, Italy and Spain”, IMF Occasional Paper, 225.

  • Danninger, Stephan (2002), “A New Rule: ‘The Swiss Debt Brake’”, IMF Working Paper, 02/18.

  • Debrun, Xavier, Natan P. Epstein, and Steven A. Symansky (2008), “A New Fiscal Rule: Should Israel Go Swiss?”, IMF Working Paper 08/87.

  • Economiesuisse (2008), Nachhaltige Finanzpolitik für Wachstum und Wohlstand.

  • Federal Council (2000), „Botschaft zur Schuldenbremse vom 5. Juli 2000“, Bundesblatt 2000, 35, pp. 4653–4726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Council (2001), „Zusatzbericht zur Botschaft zur Schuldenbremse vom 10. Januar 2001“, Bundesblatt 2001, 24, pp. 2387–2420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Council (2003), „Botschaft zum Entlastungsprogramm EP 03 vom 2. Juli 2003“, Bundesblatt 32, pp. 5615–5802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Council (2005), „Botschaft zum Entlastungsprogramm EP 04 vom 8. Februar 2005“, Bundesblatt 5, pp. 5615–5802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Council (2008), Botschaft über die Ergänzungsregel zur Schuldenbremse vom 19. September 2008, Bundesblatt 2008, 42, pp. 8491–8540.

  • Federal Department of Finance (2012), Report on the Long-Term Sustainability of Public Finances in Switzerland.

  • Geier, Alain (2011), “The Debt Brake – the Swiss Fiscal Rule at the Federal Level”, Federal Finance Administration, Working Paper 15.

  • Gfs Bern (2012), Schlussbericht zum „Finanzmonitor 2012“, Studie im Auftrag von economiesuisse.

  • von Hagen, Jürgen (1992), “Budgeting Procedures and Fiscal Performance in the European Community”, in: Commission of the European Community, Economic Papers, 96.

  • Kopits, George, and Steven A. Symansky (1998), “Fiscal Policy Rules”, IMF Occasional Paper 162.

  • Kumar, Manmohan, Emanuele Baldacci, Andrea Schaechter, Carlos Caceres, Daehaeng Kim, Xavier Debrun, Julio Escolano, Jiri Jonas, Philippe Karam, Irina Yakadina and Robert Zymek (2009), Fiscal Rules – Anchoring Expectations for Sustainable Public Finances, Washington.

  • Lampart, Daniel (2005), „Die konjunkturelle Ausrichtung der Schweizer Finanzpolitik im internationalen Vergleich“, KOF Working Papers, 109.

  • Schaltegger, Christoph A., and Martin Weder (2010), „Fiskalpolitik als antizyklisches Instrument? Eine Betrachtung der Schweiz“, Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 11(2), pp. 146–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Background paper for a presentation at the conference “The Swiss Debt Brake — Ten Years on” at the Study Center Gerzensee, Switzerland, 1–2 November 2012.

Federal Finance Administration, this paper expresses the opinion of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beljean, T., Geier, A. The Swiss debt brake — has it been a success?. Swiss J Economics Statistics 149, 115–135 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03399384

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03399384

JEL-Classification

Keywords