Skip to main content

Environmental tax reforms in Switzerland a computable general Equilibrium impact analysis

Summary

The Swiss energy strategy until 2050 envisages ambitious CO2 emission reduction targets along with substantial cutbacks in electricity consumption to establish a low-carbon economy without nuclear energy. Our computable general equilibrium analysis finds that compliance with stringent CO2 constraints requires high CO2 taxes on economic activities which are not eligible for international emissions trading; likewise, electricity consumers are burdened with substantial electricity taxes. Environmental tax reforms are not likely to generate welfare gains without accounting for the benefits of improved environmental quality. However, economic adjustment costs to a low carbon economy without nuclear energy remain modest and can be markedly reduced through revenue-neutral cuts of initial distortionary taxes. On the other hand, alternative recycling strategies pose a trade-off between efficiency and distributional justice which has to be resolved on normative grounds.

References

  1. Armington, Paul S. (1969), “A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production”, Staff Paper, International Monetary Fund, 16(1), pp. 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Böhringer, Christoph (1998), “The synthesis of Bottom-Up and Top-Down in Energy Policy Modeling”, Energy Economics, 20, pp. 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Böhringer, Christoph, and Thomas F. Rutherford (2008), “Combining Bottom-Up and Top-Down”, Energy Economics, 30, pp. 574–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dimaranan, Betina V., and Robert A. McDougall (2002), “Global Trade, Assistance, and Production”, The GTAP 5 Data Base, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University.

  5. Ecoplan (2012a), „Volkswirtschaftliche Auswirkungen der Energiestrategie 2050“, Study commissioned by the Swiss Federal Office of Energy, Berne.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ecoplan (2012b), „Volkswirtschaftliche Auswirkungen einer ökologischen Steuerreform“, Study commissioned by the Swiss Federal Office of Energy, Swiss Federal Finance Administration, Swiss Federal Tax Administration, Berne.

    Google Scholar 

  7. EU — European Union (2003), “Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 Establishing a scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading within the Community and Amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (Text with EEA relevance)”, Brussels.

  8. EU — European Union (2004), “Directive 2004/101/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 27 October 2004 Amending Directive 2003/87/ EC Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading within the Community, in Respect of the Kyoto Protocol’s Project Mechanisms (Text with EEA relevance)”. Brussels.

  9. Evers, Michiel, Ruud De Mooij, and Daniel Van Vuuren (2008), “The Wage Elasticity of Labour Supply: A Synthesis of Empirical Estimates”, De Economist, 156(1), pp. 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. FFA — Swiss Federal Finance Administration (2010), “Switzerland’s Financial Statistics for 2008”, Annual report, Berne.

  11. FSIO — Swiss Federal Social Insurance Office (2011), “Swiss Social Insurance Statistics 2011” (in German and French), Berne.

  12. FSO — Swiss Federal Statistical Office (2011), “Household Budget Surveys for the Years 2007 to 2009”, Neuchâtel.

  13. Gerfin, Michael (1993), “A Simultaneous Discrete Choice Model of Labor Supply and Wages for Married Women in Switzerland”, Empirical Economics, 18, pp. 337–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goulder, Lawrence H. (1995) “Environmental Taxation and the Double Dividend: A Reader’s Guide”, International Tax and Public Finance, 2(2), pp. 157–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mansur, Ahsan, and John Whalley (1984), “Numerical Specification of Applied General Equilibrium Models: Estimation, Calibration, and Data”, in Applied General Equilibrium Analysis, H.E. Scarf and J. B. Shoven, eds., pp. 69–127, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mohler, Lukas, and Daniel Müller (2012), “Substitution Elasticities in Swiss Manufacturing”, Study commissioned by the Swiss Federal Office of Energy.

  17. Nathani, Carsten, Christian Schmid, and Renger Van Nieuwkoop (2011), „Schätzung einer Input-Output-Tabelle der Schweiz 2008“, study commissioned by the Swiss Federal Statistical Office, Rüschlikon, Berne.

  18. Oecd – Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007), “OECD/EEA Database on Instruments Used for Environmental Policy and Natural Resources Management”, Technical Report, Paris. Available online at: http://www2.oecd.org/ecoinst/queries/index.htm.

  19. Pearce, David W. (1991), “The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjusting to Global Warming”, Economic Journal, 101.

  20. Prognos (2012), „Die Energieperspektiven für die Schweiz bis 2050 — Energienachfrage und Elektrizitätsangebot in der Schweiz 2000–2050“, Study commissioned by the Swiss Federal Office of Energy, Basel.

  21. Repetto, Robert, Roger C. Dower, Robin Jenkins, and Jacqueline Geoghegan (1992), “Green Fees: How a Tax Shift Can Work for the Environment and the Economy”, World Resources Institute.

  22. Rutherford, Thomas F. (2002), “Lecture Notes on Constant Elasticity”. Available online at: http://www.gamsworld.eu/mpsge/debreu/ces.pdf

  23. Saito, Mika (2004), “Armington Elasticities in Intermediate Inputs Trade: A Problem in Using Multilateral Trade Data”, IMF Working Paper.

  24. Welsch, Heinz (2008), “Armington Elasticities for Energy Policy Modeling: Evidence from Four European Countries”, Energy Economics, 30, pp. 2252–2264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Müller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Böhringer, C., Müller, A. Environmental tax reforms in Switzerland a computable general Equilibrium impact analysis. Swiss J Economics Statistics 150, 1–21 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03399400

Download citation

JEL-Classification

  • H21
  • D58
  • Q48

Keywords

  • environmental tax reforms
  • computable general equilibrium