Skip to main content

Who benefits most from university education in Switzerland?

Summary

Recent literature on private returns to education considers diversity in the population, heterogeneity in wage gains and self-selection into schooling. This research addresses these issues by analyzing to what extent returns associated with completing a university degree in Switzerland depend on the propensity to attend and complete this degree. Using data from the Swiss Household Panel and propensity score matching models, I find that low propensity men — after controlling for labor market variables — benefit most from a university degree while returns for women are rather homogenous along the propensity score distribution. This finding suggests that completing university increases more the earning capability of men with disadvantaged family backgrounds than that of men with more favorable background, refuting the hypothesis of comparative advantage. An auxiliary analysis focusing on the relationship between returns to education and inherent ability within a quantile regression framework leads to similar conclusions.

References

  1. Altonji, Joseph G., and Thomas A. Dunn (1996), “The Effects of Family Characteristics on the Return to Education”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(4), pp. 692–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arias, Omar, Kevin F. Hallock, and Walter Sosa-Escudero (2001), “Individual Heterogeneity in the Returns to Schooling: Instrumental Variables Quantile Regression Using Twins Data”, Empirical Economics, 26(1), pp. 7–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ashenfelter, Orley, and Cecilia E. Rouse (1998), “Income, Schooling, and Ability: Evidence from a New Sample of Identical Twins”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, pp. 253–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Basu, Anirban, James J. Heckman, Salvador Navarro-Lozano, and Sergio Urzua (2007), “Use of Instrumental Variables in the Presence of Heterogeneity and Self-Selection: An Application in Breast Cancer Patients”, Health Economics, 16(11), pp. 1133–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bauer, Philipp C., and Regina T. Riphahn (2007), “Heterogeneity in the Intergenerational Transmission of Educational Attainment: Evidence from Switzerland on Natives and Second-Generation Immigrants”, Journal of Population Economics, 20(1), pp. 121–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Becker, Gary S . (1964), Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, New York: Columbia University Press.

  7. Bjorklund, Anders, and Robert Moffitt (1987), “The Estimation of Wage Gains and Welfare Gains in Self-Selection Models”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, pp. 42–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bourdieu, Pierre (1977), Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction, in Power and Ideology in Education, J. Karabel and A. H. Halsey, eds., New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brand, Jennie, and Yu Xie (2010), “Who Benefits most from College? Evidence for Negative Selection in Heterogeneous Returns to Higher Education”, American Sociological Review, 75(2).

  10. Brand, Jennie, and Juli Simon-Thomas (2012), “Causal Effect Heterogeneity”, California Center for Population Research, Working paper 2011–2012.

  11. Buchinski, Moshe (1998), “Recent Advances in Quantile Regression Models”, Journal of Human Resources, 33, pp. 88–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Card, David (1995), “Using Geographic Variation in College Proximity to Estimate the Return to Schooling”, in Aspects of Labour Market Behavior: Essays in Honour of John Vanderkamp, L. Christofides, E. Kenneth Grant and R. Swidinsky, eds., pp. 201–222, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada.

  13. Card, David (1999), “The Causal Effect of Education on Earnings”, in Handbook of Labor Economics, O. Ashenfelter and D. Card, eds., Vol. 3A, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1801–1863.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Card, David (2001), “Estimating the Return to Schooling: Progress on Some Persistent Econometric Problems”, Econometrica, vol. 69, pp. 1127–1160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Carneiro, Pedro, James J. Heckman, and Edward Vytlacil (2001), “Estimating the Return to Education when It Varies Among Individuals”, Department of Economics, University of Chicago, mimeo.

  16. Carneiro, Pedro, James J. Heckman, and Edward Vytlacil (2011), “Estimating Marginal Returns to Education”, American Economic Review, 101(6), pp. 2754–2781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cattaneo, Alejandra, Sandra Hanslin, and Rainer Winkelmann (2007), “The Apple Falls Increasingly Far: Parent-Child Correlation in Schooling and the Growth of Post-Secondary Education in Switzerland”, Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 143(2), pp. 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Checchi, Daniele (2006), The Economics of Education: Human Capital, Family Background and Inequality, Cambridge University Press.

  19. Coleman, James S. (1988), “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 94, pp. 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. (CSRE) Centre Suisse pour la Recherche en Education (2010), Swiss Education Report 2010, Aarau.

  21. Deschenes, Olivier (2007), “Estimating the Effects of Family Background on the Return to Schooling”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 25(3).

  22. De Coulon, Augustin (1998), “Wage Differentials between Ethnic Groups in Switzerland”, Labour, 15(1), pp. 111–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Diekmann, Andreas, and Henriette Engelhardt (1955), „Einkommensungleichheit zwischen Frauen and Mannern, Eine ökonometrische Analyse der Schweizer Arbeitskräfteerhebung“, Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 1, pp. 57–83.

  24. Falter, Jean-Marc (2004), Educational Attainment in Switzerland: The Role of Observable and Non-Observable Family Factors, mimeo.

  25. Ferro-Luzzi, Giovanni G., and Jacques Silber (1998), “On Gender Differences in Wages in Switzerland”, International Journal of Manpower, 19(7), pp. 475–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Garen, John (1984), “The Returns to Schooling: A Selectivity Bias Approach with a Continuous Choice Variable”, Econometrica, 52(5), pp. 1199–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Golder, Stefan M. (1997), „Die Arbeitsmarktperformance von Einwanderern in der Schweiz. Eine theorische und empirische Analyse im Rahmen eines internationalen Vergleichs“, WWZ-Forschungsbericht, Universtität Basel.

  28. Griliches, Zvi (1977), “Estimating the Returns to Schooling: Some Econometric Problems”, Econometrica, 45, pp. 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Grilli, Leonardo, and Carla Rampichini (2011), “Propensity Scores for the Estimation of Average Treatment Effects in Observational Studies”, Training Sessions on Causal Inference, Bristol.

  30. Halvorsen, Robert, and Raymond Palmquist (1980), “The Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations”, American Economic Review, 70(3), pp. 474–475.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Harmon, Colm, and Ian Walker (1995), “Estimates of the Economic Return to Schooling for the United Kingdom”, American Economic Review, 85(5), pp. 1278–1286.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Heckman, James J. (1979), “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error”, Econometrica, Vol. 47, pp. 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Heckman, James J., and Richard Robb (1985), “Alternative Methods for Evaluating the Impact of Interventions”, in Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data, J. Heckman and B. Singer, eds., New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 156–245.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Heckman, James J., and Edward Vytlacil (1998), “Instrumental Variables Methods for the Correlated Random Coefficient Model: Estimating the Rate of Return to Schooling when the Return is Correlated with Schooling”, Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 23, pp. 974–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Heckman, James J., Justin L . Tobias, and Edward Vytlacil (2001), “Four Parameters of Interest in the Evaluation of Social Programs”, Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 68, pp. 210–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Heckman, James J., Sergio Urzua, and Edward Vytlacil (2006), “Understanding Instrumental Variables in Models with Essential Heterogeneity”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(3), pp. 389–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Heckman, James J., and Edward Vytlacil (2007), “Econometric Evaluation of Social Programs, Part II: Using the Marginal Treatment Effect to Organize Alternative Econometric Estimators to Evaluate Social Programs, and to Forecast their Effects in New Environments”, in Handbook of Econometrics, J. Heckman and E. Leamer, eds., Vol. 6B, Chapter 71, pp. 4875–5144, Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  38. Holland, Paul W. (1986), “Statistics and Causal Inference”, American Statistical Association, 81(396), pp. 945–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jann, Ben, Jennie Brand, and Yu Xie (2008), -hte- Stata Module to Perform Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Analysis.

  40. Kane, Thomas J., and Cecilia E. Rouse (1995), “Labor-Market Returns to Two-and Four-Year College”, American Economic Review, Vol. 85, pp. 600–614.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kugler, Peter (1988), „Lohndiskriminierung in der Schweiz: Evidenz von Mikrodaten“, Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 124(1), pp. 23–47.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Miller, Paul, Charles Mulvey, and Nick Mart (1995), “What Do Twins Studies Reveal about the Economic Returns To Education? A Comparison of Australian and U.S.”, American Economic Review, 85(3), pp. 586–599.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mincer, Jacob A. (1974), Schooling, Experience, and Earnings, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Morgan, Stephen L. (2005), On the Edge of Commitment: Educational Attainment and Race in the United States, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. OECD (2013), OECD Economic Surveys: Switzerland 2013, OECD Publishing.

  46. Pereira, Pedro T., and Pedro Silva-Martins (2004), “Does Education Reduce Wage Inequality? Quantile Regression Evidence from 16 countries”, Labour Economics, 11(3), pp. 355–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Pons, Empar, and Maria T. Gonzalo (2002), “Returns to Schooling in Spain: How Reliable Are Instrumental Variable Estimates?”, Labour, 16(4), pp. 747–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Putnam, Robert (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York, Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rantanen M. (2009), “Returns to Education Using the Finnish Twin Data”, mimeo.

  50. Roberts, Michael R. (2009), “Causality and Experiments”, University of Pennsylvania.

  51. Sheldon, George (1992), „Selbstselektion und Bildungsrenditen — ökonometrische Untersuchungen an einem Mikro-Datensatz für die Schweiz“, in Ökonomie und Politik beruflicher Bildung — Europäische Entwicklungen, Sadowski D. und A. Timmesfeld, eds., Duncker und Humblot, Berlin.

  52. Smith, Herbert L., and Brian Powell (1990), “Great Expectations: Variations in Income Expectations among College Seniors”, Sociology of Education, 63, pp. 194–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Suter, Stephan (2006), Bildung oder Begabung? Eine ökonometrische Untersuchung zu den Ursachen individueller Lohnunterschiede, Schriftenreihe volkswirtschaftliche Forschungsergebnisse, 113, Hamburg.

  54. Tsai, Shu-Ling, and Yu Xie (2008), “Changes in Earnings Returns to Higher Education in Taiwan since the 1990s”, Population Review, 47, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Vellacott, Maja C., and Stefan C. Wolter (2004), Equity in the Swiss Education System: Dimensions, Causes and Policy Responses, National report from Switzerland contributing to the OECD’s review of “Equity in Education”, CSRE.

  56. Willis, Robert J., and Sherwin Rosen (1979), “Education and Self-Selection”, Journal of Political Economy, 87, pp. 7–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Willis, Robert J. (1987), “Wage Determinants: A Survey and Reinterpretation of Human Capital Earnings Functions”, in Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 1, O. Ashenfelter and R. Layard, eds., Chapter 10.

  58. Wolter, Stefan C., and Bernhard A. Weber (2005), «La rentabilité de la formation: un indicateur économique essentiel à l’enseignement», La Vie Economique.

  59. Xie, Yu, Jennie Brand, and Ben Jann (2011), “Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Observational Data”, Population Studies Center Research Report 11-729.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lionel Perini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perini, L. Who benefits most from university education in Switzerland?. Swiss J Economics Statistics 150, 119–159 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03399404

Download citation

JEL-Classification

  • I21
  • I24
  • J31

Keywords

  • Return to education
  • heterogeneity
  • propensity score matching