Assessing the Impacts of Non-Ricardian Households in an Estimated New Keynesian DSGE Model
Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics volume 150, pages 353–398 (2014)
Summary
A New Keynesian DSGE model with non-Ricardian households is estimated for the Portuguese economy and the stability of the model’s prediction (posterior distributions, impulse responses, and sources of fluctuations in endogenous variables) tested under different assumptions on non-Ricardian households. Their share is estimated to be relatively high (58 %). Furthermore, estimates of several parameters as well as the magnitude and persistence of shocks are particularly sensitive to the share of non-Ricardian households. Impulse responses to consumption preference and productivity shocks are amplified for lower shares; for greater proportions, the model predicts more noticeable responses to price markup and government spending shocks. Fluctuations in output growth are mainly driven by productivity shocks for a lower share and by price markup shocks in the opposite scenario. A high proportion of these households together with a high degree of price stickiness lead the Taylor-type interest rate rule solution to be locally indeterminate.
References
Abel, Andrew (1990), “Asset Prices under Habit Formation and Catching Up with the Joneses”, American Economic Review, 80, pp. 38–42.
Adolfson, Malin, Stefan Laseén, Jesper Lindé, and Mattias Villani (2007), “Bayesian Estimation of an Open Economy DSGE Model with Incomplete Pass-Through”, Journal of International Economics, 72, pp. 481–511.
Afonso, António, and Ricardo M. Sousa (2011), “The Macroeconomic Effects of Fiscal Policy in Portugal: A Bayesian SVAR Analysis”, Portuguese Economic Journal, 10, pp. 61–82.
Almeida, Vanda (2009), “Bayesian Estimation of a DSGE Model for the Portuguese Economy”, Working Paper Series N. 14, Bank of Portugal.
Almeida, Vanda, Gabriela Castro, and Ricardo M. Felix (2010), “Improving Competition in the Non-Tradable Goods and Labour Markets: The Portuguese Case”, Portuguese Economic Journal, 9, pp. 163–193.
An, Sungbae, and Frank Schorfheide (2007), “Bayesian Analysis of DSGE Models”, Econometric Reviews, 26, pp. 113–172.
Bernanke, Ben S., Mark Gertler, and Simon Gilchrist (1999), “The Financial Accelerator in a Quantitative Business Cycle Framework”, in Handbook of Macroeconomics, J. B. Taylor and M. Woodford, eds., vol. 1, chap. 11, pp. 1341–1393, Elsevier.
Blanchard, Olivier J., and Charles M. Kahn (1980), “The Solution of Linear Difference Models under Rational Expectations”, Econometrica, 48, pp. 1305–1311.
Brooks, Stephen P., and Andrew Gelman (1998), “General Methods for Monitoring Convergence of Iterative Simulations”, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7, pp. 434–455.
Calvo, Guillermo A. (1983), “Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing Framework”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 12, pp. 383–398.
Campbell, John Y., and N. Gregory Mankiw (1989), “Consumption, Income and Interest Rates: Reinterpreting the Time Series Evidence”, in NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1989, Volume NBER Chapters, pp. 185–246, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Canova, Fabio (2007), Methods for Applied Macroeconomic Research, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Christiano, Lawrence J., Martin Eichenbaum, and Charles L. Evans (2005), “Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy”, Journal of Political Economy, 113, pp. 1–45.
Coenen, Gunter, and Roland Straub (2005), “Does Government Spending Crowd in Private Consumption: Theory and Empirical Evidence for the Euro Area”, International Finance, 8, pp. 435–470.
DeJong, David N., and Chetan Dave (2007), Structural Macroeconometrics, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Dejong, David N., Beth F. Ingram, and Charles H. Whiteman (2000), “A Bayesian Approach to Dynamic Macroeconomics”, Journal of Econometrics, 98, pp. 203–223.
Del Negro, Marco, and Frank Schorfheide (2004), “Priors from General Equilibrium Models for VARs”, International Economic Review, 45, pp. 643–673.
Del Negro, Marco, Frank Schorfheide, Frank Smets, and Raf Wouters (2007), “On the Fit of New Keynesian Models”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 25, pp. 123–143.
Dixit, Avinash, and Joseph Stiglitz (1977), “Monopolistic Competition and Optimal Product Diversity”, American Economic Review, 67, pp. 297–308.
Erceg, Christopher J., Dale W. Henderson, and Andrew T. Levin (2000), “Optimal Monetary Policy with Staggered Wage and Price Contracts”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 46, pp. 281–313.
Evans, George W., and Seppo Honkapohja (2001), Learning and Expectations in Macroeconomics, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Fernández-Villaverde, Jesus, and Juan F. Rubio-Ramírez (2004), “Comparing Dynamic Equilibrium Models to Data: A Bayesian Approach”, Journal of Econometrics, 123, pp. 153–187.
Fernández-Villaverde, Jesus, Juan F. Rubio-Ramírez, and Thomas J. Sargent (2005), “A, B, C’s (and D’s) for Understanding VARs”, Working Paper 9, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
Forni, Lorenzo, Libero Monteforte, and Luca Sessa (2009), “The Estimated General Equilibrium Effects of Fiscal Policy: The Case of the Euro Area”, Journal of Public Economics, 93, pp. 559–585.
Galí, Jordi, J. David López-Salido, and Javier Vallés (2004), “Rule-of-Thumb Consumers and the Design of Interest Rate Rules”, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 36, pp. 739–763.
Galí, Jordi, J. David López-Salido, and Javier Vallés (2007), “Understanding the Effects of Government Spending on Consumption”, Journal of the European Economic Association, 5, pp. 227–270.
Gelman, Andrew, and Donald B. Rubin (1992), “Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences”, Statistical Science, 7, pp. 457–511.
Geweke, John (1999), “Using Simulation Methods for Bayesian Econometric Models: Inference, Development and Communication”, Econometric Reviews, 18, pp. 1–126.
Mankiw, Gregory N. (2000), “The Savers-Spenders Theory of Fiscal Policy”, American Economic Review, 90, pp. 120–125.
Milani, Fabio (2007), “Expectations, Learning and Macroeconomic Persistence”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 54, pp. 2065–2082.
Mountford, Andrew, and Harald Uhlig (2004), “What Are the Effects of Fiscal Policy Shocks?”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 24, pp. 960–992.
Otrok, Christopher (2001), “On Measuring the Welfare Costs of Business Cycles”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 45, pp. 61–92.
Perotti, Roberto (1999), “Fiscal Policy in Good Times and Bad”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, pp. 1399–1436.
Perotti, Roberto (2004), “Estimating the Effects of Fiscal Policy in OECD Countries”, Working Paper N. 276, IGIER.
Rabanal, Pau and Juan F. Rubioramírez (2005), “Comparing New Keynesian Models of the Business Cycle: A Bayesian Approach”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 52, pp. 1151–1166.
Schorfheide, Frank (2000), “Loss Function-Based Evaluation of DSGE Model”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15, pp. 645–670.
Smets, Frank, and Raf Wouters (2003), “An Estimated DSGE Model of the Euro Area”, Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, pp. 1123–1175.
Smets, Frank, and Raf Wouters (2007), “Shocks and Frictions in US Business Cycles: A Bayesian DSGE Approach”, American Economic Review, 97, pp. 586–606.
Taylor, John B. (1980), “Aggregate Dynamics and Staggered Contracts”, Journal of Political Economy, 88, pp. 1–23.
Yun, Tack (1996), “Nominal Price Rigidity, Money Supply Endogeneity and Business Cycle”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 37, pp. 345–370.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
I am grateful to Toru Kitagawa, Vincent Sterk, Riccardo Constantini, and Hector Conroy for their valuable inputs. Useful insights from the lectures of Paul Levine and Bo Yang given at the NIPE’s 9th summer school are duly acknowledged. The views expressed in this paper are mine and should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the IDB. Any errors or shortcomings are my responsibility.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Marto, R. Assessing the Impacts of Non-Ricardian Households in an Estimated New Keynesian DSGE Model. Swiss J Economics Statistics 150, 353–398 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03399411
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03399411
JEL-Classification
- C11
- E12
- E37
- E52
- E62
Keywords
- DSGE
- New Keynesian model
- non-Ricardian households
- Bayesian inference
- Portugal