Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

The Characteristics of FDI Activities Located in Different Host Regions — A Study Based on Firm-Level Data

  • 647 Accesses

Summary

Based on a unique firm-level dataset for Swiss MNEs, this paper characterizes FDI activities located in different host regions. The characterization of the FDI activities is based on information on the parent companies, their foreign subsidiaries and the two-way trade flows between parent companies and foreign affiliates Concretely, the study provides econometric evidence based on multivariate probit estimates about the relationship between a firm’s choice of nine alternative host regions and the type of FDI (horizontal production-oriented, vertical production-oriented, distribution-oriented), a firm’s FDI experience and its capabilities for innovation, respectively. The estimation results indicate that there is low correlation between a firm’s capability for innovation and FDI experience, respectively, and the location of their FDI activities. Further, our estimates indicate large heterogeneity with respect to the type of FDI activities.

References

  1. Arvanitis, Spyros, Heinz Hollenstein, Marius Ley, and Tobias Stucki (2011), “Die Internationalisierung des Dienstleistungssektors und der Industrie der Schweizer Wirtschaft”, Kof Studien, 21, Zürich.

  2. Aw, Bee Yan, and Yi Lee (2008), “Firm Heterogeneity and Location Choice of Taiwanese Multinationals”, Journal of International Economics 75(1), pp. 167–179.

  3. Barrios, Salvador, Holger Görg, and Eric Strobl (2006), “Multinationals’ Location Choice, Agglomeration Economies and Public Incentives”, International Regional Science Review 29(1), pp. 81–107.

  4. Basile, Roberto, Davide Castellani, and Antonello Zanfei (2008), “Location Choice of Multinational Firms in Europe: The Role of EU Cohesion Policy”, Journal of International Economics 74(2), pp. 328–340.

  5. Blonigen, Bruce A. (2005), “A Review of the Empirical Literature on FDI Determinants”, Atlantic Economic Journal 33(4), pp. 383–403.

  6. Blonigen, Bruce A., and Miao Wang (2005), “Inappropriate Pooling of Wealthy and Poor Countries in Empirical FDI Studies”, in Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Development? T. Moran, E. Graham and M. Blomstrom, eds., pp. 221–243. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

  7. Brainard, S. Lael (1993), “An Empirical Assessment of the Factor Proportions Explanation of Multi-National Sales”, NBER Working Papers 4583. Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.

  8. Brainard, S. Lael (1997), “An Empirical Assessment of the Proximity-Concentration Tradeoff between Multinational Sales and Trade”, American Economic Review 87(4), pp. 520–544.

  9. Cantwell, John (2008), “Location and the Multinational Enterprise”, Journal of International Business Studies 40(1), pp. 35–41.

  10. Cassiman, Bruno, and Reinhilde Veugelers (2002), “R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium”, American Economic Review 92(4), pp. 1169–1184.

  11. CEPII (2010), CEPII geographic data. http://www.cepii.fr/anglaisgraph/bdd/distances.htm

  12. Chen, Maggie Xiaoyang, and Michael O. Moore (2010), “Location Decisions of Heterogeneous Multinational Firms”, Journal of International Economics 80, pp. 188–199.

  13. Davidson, William H. (1980), “The Location of Foreign Direct Investment Activity: Country Characteristics and Experience Effects”, Journal of International Business Studies 11(2), pp. 9–22.

  14. Demirbag, Mehmet, and Keith W. Glaister (2010), “Factors Determining Offshore Location Choice for R&D Projects: A Comparative Study of Developed and Emerging Regions”, Journal of Management Studies 47, pp. 1534–1561.

  15. Duanmu, Jing-Lin (2012), “Firm Heterogeneity and Location Choice of Chinese Multinational Enterprises (MNEs)”, Journal of World Business, 47(1), pp. 64–72.

  16. Duanmu, Jing-Lin (2014), “A Race to Lower Standards? Labor Standards and Location Choice of Outward FDI from the BRIC Countries”, International Business Review, 23(3), pp. 620–634.

  17. Dunning, John H. (2000), “The Eclectic Paradigm as an Envelope for Economic and Business Theories of MNE Activity”, International Business Review, 9(2), pp. 163–190.

  18. Dunning, John H., and Sarianna M. Lundan (2008), Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Elgar: Cheltenham.

  19. Eaton, Jonathan, and Akiko Tamura (1994), “Bilateralism and Regionalism in Japanese and US Trade and Foreign Direct Investment Relationships”, Journal of Japanese and International Economics 8, pp. 478–510.

  20. Ekholm, Karolina (1998), “Proximity Advantages, Scale Economies, and the Location of Production”, in The Geography of Multinationals, P. Braunerhjelm and K. Ekholm, eds., Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

  21. Gazaniol, Alexandre (2014), “The Location Choices of Multinational Firms: The Role of Internationalization Experience and Group Affiliation”, The World Economy, doi: 10.1111/twec.12186.

  22. Gassmann, Oliver, and Zheng Han (2004), “Motivations and Barriers of Foreign R&D Activities in China”, R&D Management 34(4), pp. 423–437.

  23. Grossman, Gene M., and Esteban Rossi-Hansberg (2008), “Trading Tasks: A Simple Theory of Offshoring”, American Economic Review, 98(5), pp. 1978–1997.

  24. Guimaraes, Paulo, Octávio Figueiredo, and Douglas Woodward (2000), “Agglomeration and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment in Portugal”, Journal of Urban Economics 47(1), pp. 115–135.

  25. Hanson, Gordon H., Raymond J. Mataloni Jr, and Matthew J. Slaughter (2001), “Expansion Strategies of U.S. Multinational Firms”, In Brookings Trade Forum, ed. D. Rodrik and S. Collins, pp. 245–294.

  26. Hattari, Rabin, and Ramkishen S. Rajan (2009), “Understanding bilateral FDI Flows in Developing Asia”, Asian-Pacific Economic Literature 23(2), pp. 73–93.

  27. Johanson, Jan, and Jan-Erik Vahlne (1977), “The Internationalization Process of the Firm: A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments”, Journal of International Business Studies 8(1), pp. 23–32.

  28. Johanson, Jan, and Finn Wiedersheim-Paul (1975), “The Internationalization of the Firm: Four Swedish Case Studies”, Journal of Management Studies 12(3), pp. 305–322.

  29. Kang, Yuanfei, and Fuming Jiang (2012), “FDI Location Choice of Chinese Multinationals in East and Southeast Asia: Traditional Economic Factors and Institutional Perspective”, Journal of World Business, 47(1), pp. 45–53.

  30. Keller, Wolfgang, and Stephen R. Yeaple (2009), “Gravity in the Weightless Economy”, NBER Working Papers 8433. Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research.

  31. Kogut, Bruce, and Sea-Jin Chang (1991), “Technological Capabilities and Japanese Direct Investment in the United States”, Review of Economics and Statistics 73(3), pp 401–413

  32. Le Bas, Christian, and Christophe Sierra (2002), “Location vs. Country Advantages in R&D Activities: Some Further Results on Multinationals’ Location Strategies”, Research Policy 31(4), pp. 589–609.

  33. Makino, Shige, Paul W. Beamish, and Natalie Bin Zhao (2004), “The Characteristics and Performance of Japanese FDI in Less Developed and Developed Countries”, Journal of World Business 39(4), pp. 377–392.

  34. Mody, Ashoka, Assaf Razin, and Efraim Sadka (2003), “The Role of Information in Driving FDI Flows: Host-Country Tranparency and Source Country Specialization”, NBER Working Papers 9662. Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research.

  35. Nachum, Lilach, Srilata Zaheer, and Shulamith Gross (2008), “Does It Matter Where Countries Are? Proximity to Knowledge, Markets and Resources, and MNE Location Choices”, Management Science 54, pp. 1252–1265.

  36. Py, Loriane, and Fabrice Hatem (2009), “Internationalization and Location of Services: A Sectoral and Functional Analysis Applied to Multinational Firms in Europe”, Économie et Statistique, 426, pp. 67–95.

  37. Shatz, Howard J., and Anthony J. Venables (2000), “The Geography of International Investment”, Policy Research Working Paper Series 2338, Washinton D.C.: The World Bank.

  38. Siedschlag, Iulia, Donal Smith, Camelia Turcu, and Xiaoheng Zhang (2013), “What Determines the Location Choice of R&D Activities by Multinational Firms?”, Research Policy, 42, pp. 1420–1430.

  39. SNB (2011), “Kapitalbestand von Schweizer Direktinvestitionen im Ausland 2008”, http://www.snb.ch/de/iabout/stat/statpub/fdi/stats/fdi.

  40. Transparency International (2008), “TI Corruption Perceptions Index 2008”, http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2008.

  41. UBS (2009), “Prices and earnings 2009”, http://www.ubs.com/l/e/wealthmanagement/wealth_management_research/prices_earnings.

  42. World Salaries (2005), “International Average Employment Income Comparison”, http://www.worldsalaries.org/employment-income.shtml.

  43. Worldbank (2010), “World Development Indicators (WDI) and Global Development Finance (GDF)”, http://databank.worldbank.org.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Spyros Arvanitis.

Additional information

Acknowledgments: This article has greatly benefited from the guidance of the Editor, Volker Grossmann, and the comments and suggestions of two anonymous reviewers of this journal. The research has been supported by the Swiss State Secretariat of Economics (Seco).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arvanitis, S., Hollenstein, H. & Stucki, T. The Characteristics of FDI Activities Located in Different Host Regions — A Study Based on Firm-Level Data. Swiss J Economics Statistics 151, 261–298 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03399418

Download citation

Keyword

  • Foreign Direct Investment
  • Global Location Portfolios
  • Intra-Firm Trade

JEL classification

  • F2