Skip to main content

The Characteristics of FDI Activities Located in Different Host Regions — A Study Based on Firm-Level Data

Summary

Based on a unique firm-level dataset for Swiss MNEs, this paper characterizes FDI activities located in different host regions. The characterization of the FDI activities is based on information on the parent companies, their foreign subsidiaries and the two-way trade flows between parent companies and foreign affiliates Concretely, the study provides econometric evidence based on multivariate probit estimates about the relationship between a firm’s choice of nine alternative host regions and the type of FDI (horizontal production-oriented, vertical production-oriented, distribution-oriented), a firm’s FDI experience and its capabilities for innovation, respectively. The estimation results indicate that there is low correlation between a firm’s capability for innovation and FDI experience, respectively, and the location of their FDI activities. Further, our estimates indicate large heterogeneity with respect to the type of FDI activities.

References

  • Arvanitis, Spyros, Heinz Hollenstein, Marius Ley, and Tobias Stucki (2011), “Die Internationalisierung des Dienstleistungssektors und der Industrie der Schweizer Wirtschaft”, Kof Studien, 21, Zürich.

  • Aw, Bee Yan, and Yi Lee (2008), “Firm Heterogeneity and Location Choice of Taiwanese Multinationals”, Journal of International Economics 75(1), pp. 167–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrios, Salvador, Holger Görg, and Eric Strobl (2006), “Multinationals’ Location Choice, Agglomeration Economies and Public Incentives”, International Regional Science Review 29(1), pp. 81–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basile, Roberto, Davide Castellani, and Antonello Zanfei (2008), “Location Choice of Multinational Firms in Europe: The Role of EU Cohesion Policy”, Journal of International Economics 74(2), pp. 328–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blonigen, Bruce A. (2005), “A Review of the Empirical Literature on FDI Determinants”, Atlantic Economic Journal 33(4), pp. 383–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blonigen, Bruce A., and Miao Wang (2005), “Inappropriate Pooling of Wealthy and Poor Countries in Empirical FDI Studies”, in Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Development? T. Moran, E. Graham and M. Blomstrom, eds., pp. 221–243. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, S. Lael (1993), “An Empirical Assessment of the Factor Proportions Explanation of Multi-National Sales”, NBER Working Papers 4583. Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, S. Lael (1997), “An Empirical Assessment of the Proximity-Concentration Tradeoff between Multinational Sales and Trade”, American Economic Review 87(4), pp. 520–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, John (2008), “Location and the Multinational Enterprise”, Journal of International Business Studies 40(1), pp. 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassiman, Bruno, and Reinhilde Veugelers (2002), “R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium”, American Economic Review 92(4), pp. 1169–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEPII (2010), CEPII geographic data. http://www.cepii.fr/anglaisgraph/bdd/distances.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Maggie Xiaoyang, and Michael O. Moore (2010), “Location Decisions of Heterogeneous Multinational Firms”, Journal of International Economics 80, pp. 188–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, William H. (1980), “The Location of Foreign Direct Investment Activity: Country Characteristics and Experience Effects”, Journal of International Business Studies 11(2), pp. 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirbag, Mehmet, and Keith W. Glaister (2010), “Factors Determining Offshore Location Choice for R&D Projects: A Comparative Study of Developed and Emerging Regions”, Journal of Management Studies 47, pp. 1534–1561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duanmu, Jing-Lin (2012), “Firm Heterogeneity and Location Choice of Chinese Multinational Enterprises (MNEs)”, Journal of World Business, 47(1), pp. 64–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duanmu, Jing-Lin (2014), “A Race to Lower Standards? Labor Standards and Location Choice of Outward FDI from the BRIC Countries”, International Business Review, 23(3), pp. 620–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, John H. (2000), “The Eclectic Paradigm as an Envelope for Economic and Business Theories of MNE Activity”, International Business Review, 9(2), pp. 163–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, John H., and Sarianna M. Lundan (2008), Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Elgar: Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, Jonathan, and Akiko Tamura (1994), “Bilateralism and Regionalism in Japanese and US Trade and Foreign Direct Investment Relationships”, Journal of Japanese and International Economics 8, pp. 478–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm, Karolina (1998), “Proximity Advantages, Scale Economies, and the Location of Production”, in The Geography of Multinationals, P. Braunerhjelm and K. Ekholm, eds., Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazaniol, Alexandre (2014), “The Location Choices of Multinational Firms: The Role of Internationalization Experience and Group Affiliation”, The World Economy, doi: 10.1111/twec.12186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, Oliver, and Zheng Han (2004), “Motivations and Barriers of Foreign R&D Activities in China”, R&D Management 34(4), pp. 423–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, Gene M., and Esteban Rossi-Hansberg (2008), “Trading Tasks: A Simple Theory of Offshoring”, American Economic Review, 98(5), pp. 1978–1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guimaraes, Paulo, Octávio Figueiredo, and Douglas Woodward (2000), “Agglomeration and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment in Portugal”, Journal of Urban Economics 47(1), pp. 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, Gordon H., Raymond J. Mataloni Jr, and Matthew J. Slaughter (2001), “Expansion Strategies of U.S. Multinational Firms”, In Brookings Trade Forum, ed. D. Rodrik and S. Collins, pp. 245–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattari, Rabin, and Ramkishen S. Rajan (2009), “Understanding bilateral FDI Flows in Developing Asia”, Asian-Pacific Economic Literature 23(2), pp. 73–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, Jan, and Jan-Erik Vahlne (1977), “The Internationalization Process of the Firm: A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments”, Journal of International Business Studies 8(1), pp. 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, Jan, and Finn Wiedersheim-Paul (1975), “The Internationalization of the Firm: Four Swedish Case Studies”, Journal of Management Studies 12(3), pp. 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, Yuanfei, and Fuming Jiang (2012), “FDI Location Choice of Chinese Multinationals in East and Southeast Asia: Traditional Economic Factors and Institutional Perspective”, Journal of World Business, 47(1), pp. 45–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Wolfgang, and Stephen R. Yeaple (2009), “Gravity in the Weightless Economy”, NBER Working Papers 8433. Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, Bruce, and Sea-Jin Chang (1991), “Technological Capabilities and Japanese Direct Investment in the United States”, Review of Economics and Statistics 73(3), pp 401–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bas, Christian, and Christophe Sierra (2002), “Location vs. Country Advantages in R&D Activities: Some Further Results on Multinationals’ Location Strategies”, Research Policy 31(4), pp. 589–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makino, Shige, Paul W. Beamish, and Natalie Bin Zhao (2004), “The Characteristics and Performance of Japanese FDI in Less Developed and Developed Countries”, Journal of World Business 39(4), pp. 377–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mody, Ashoka, Assaf Razin, and Efraim Sadka (2003), “The Role of Information in Driving FDI Flows: Host-Country Tranparency and Source Country Specialization”, NBER Working Papers 9662. Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachum, Lilach, Srilata Zaheer, and Shulamith Gross (2008), “Does It Matter Where Countries Are? Proximity to Knowledge, Markets and Resources, and MNE Location Choices”, Management Science 54, pp. 1252–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Py, Loriane, and Fabrice Hatem (2009), “Internationalization and Location of Services: A Sectoral and Functional Analysis Applied to Multinational Firms in Europe”, Économie et Statistique, 426, pp. 67–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shatz, Howard J., and Anthony J. Venables (2000), “The Geography of International Investment”, Policy Research Working Paper Series 2338, Washinton D.C.: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siedschlag, Iulia, Donal Smith, Camelia Turcu, and Xiaoheng Zhang (2013), “What Determines the Location Choice of R&D Activities by Multinational Firms?”, Research Policy, 42, pp. 1420–1430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SNB (2011), “Kapitalbestand von Schweizer Direktinvestitionen im Ausland 2008”, http://www.snb.ch/de/iabout/stat/statpub/fdi/stats/fdi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International (2008), “TI Corruption Perceptions Index 2008”, http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • UBS (2009), “Prices and earnings 2009”, http://www.ubs.com/l/e/wealthmanagement/wealth_management_research/prices_earnings.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Salaries (2005), “International Average Employment Income Comparison”, http://www.worldsalaries.org/employment-income.shtml.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worldbank (2010), “World Development Indicators (WDI) and Global Development Finance (GDF)”, http://databank.worldbank.org.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Spyros Arvanitis.

Additional information

Acknowledgments: This article has greatly benefited from the guidance of the Editor, Volker Grossmann, and the comments and suggestions of two anonymous reviewers of this journal. The research has been supported by the Swiss State Secretariat of Economics (Seco).

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arvanitis, S., Hollenstein, H. & Stucki, T. The Characteristics of FDI Activities Located in Different Host Regions — A Study Based on Firm-Level Data. Swiss J Economics Statistics 151, 261–298 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03399418

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03399418

Keyword

  • Foreign Direct Investment
  • Global Location Portfolios
  • Intra-Firm Trade

JEL classification

  • F2